Problem-solving, not self-esteem

The Washington Post ran a very interesting article over the weekend about the move away from lavishing praise on children for participation rather than accomplishments.  Recent research has shown deep flaws in the decades-old belief that we need to praise children in order to boost their self-esteem.  The article cited the 2006 Brookings study showing that American students had only average math skills compared to international students, but had much higher confidence about their abilities. Unearned praise actually may hinder learning, causing children to become complacent and shy away from challenges.

The new paradigm rewards students for conquering challenges and learning new skills.  This seems to be a good principle for any youth-serving organization.  While we want children to feel self-confident, they learn that best from actual achievement.  The goal is to give them reachable, measurable goals, and then praise them for reaching those.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporting: When to Report

The final and most difficult question in mandated reporting is knowing when to report suspicions.  North Carolina law requires a report when the mandated reporter has “cause to suspect” abuse, while Georgia requires “reasonable cause to believe” that a child has been abused.  But what is “cause”?

There are only two definite red flags for abuse — a third party witness or disclosure from the child.  Everything else is what I call “pink flags,” because the signs are ambiguous and always could have an innocent cause.  Nevertheless, they are important to know, because enough of the signs can add up to a requirement to report. Continue reading

Posted in Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporting: What to Report

The next question is knowing what to report to the authorities. There may be a difference between what you MUST report, and what you SHOULD report. North Carolina law, for example, requires reports only of abuse by a “parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker.” Yet, it clearly would be best practices for a child care institution to report suspected abuse by a staff member or third party as well as parents. Georgia, by contrast, requires reports of physical injury or neglect by a parent or caretaker, and sexual abuse or exploitation by anyone.

Another question is the type of abuse that is covered. North Carolina lists physical abuse, neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and allowing or encouraging serious delinquent acts. Georgia, by contrast, lists only physical abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse.

Some states are considering whether to include exposure to domestic violence as a type of abuse, but to my knowledge, none has yet included it. If you learn of domestic violence, nevertheless, you should consider reporting it, as it is a strong indicator of possible abuse.

Posted in Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

We interrupt our regularly scheduled programming . . .

to link to an article about my recent trial win.  I will be back on Monday after the holidays with more in the mandated reporters series.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporters: An Object Lesson

I have posted previously (here, here, and here) about the perils of failing to report child abuse.  Now there is another report of a lawsuit filed against a church for failing to report suspected abuse.

Posted in Child Abuse, Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporters: Where to Report

One question that the Penn State scandal has raised is to whom mandated reporters should report.  North Carolina, for example, requires a report to county social services department.  Directors of child care facilities must report directly to the State Bureau of Investigation. Georgia also requires a report to social services or law enforcement, but allows a staff member to report to a supervisor, who then must make the report.  This practice of allowing in-house reports has received a lot of criticism lately, but it is a sensible system. Continue reading

Posted in Child Abuse, Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporters: Know Your Statutes

One point I forgot when I started this series is that the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services has a website that is an excellent resource.  For a quick reference of the requirements in your particular state, start here.

Posted in Child Abuse, Mandated Reporter, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mandated Reporters: Who Should Report?

The initial question in mandated reporter statutes is who must report suspected abuse.  The two states where I am licensed, Georgia and North Carolina, are at opposite ends of the spectrum on that question.  Georgia lists specific occupations, O.C.G.A. § 19-7-5, while North Carolina requires “any person or institution” to report.  N.C.G.A. § 7B-301.   Most states are on Georgia’s end of the spectrum.

Who must report, however, is not the same as who should report abuse.  The best practice is for all organizations that serve young people to report suspected abuse.  That policy, of course, carries with it the obligation to train staff members to recognize abuse. Fortunately, many state agencies offer such training.

Check first with your licensing organization to see what training it offers.  Next, look at online training, such as the California Mandated Reporter Project and the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.  Finally, talk to organizations with a training curriculum, such as the Safe Sanctuaries program of the United Methodist Church.

Posted in Child Abuse, Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse

One of the consequences of the Penn State scandal is intense interest in statutes that require certain people to report suspicions of child abuse.   These “mandated reporters” are subject to a variety of penalties for failing to report, depending on the law in the specific state.  Given that interest, I decided a series of posts on the topic might be helpful.  So, follow along the next few days as I examine some of the principles involved.

Posted in Child Abuse, Mandated Reporter | Leave a comment

Catching up with Penn State

I have been in trial, and only recently have surfaced. Apparently, all sorts of interesting things happened while I was distracted, starting with the allegations about Sandusky at Penn State. I am still gathering information, so I don’t have a lot of strong opinions (yet). What I have read so far, however, fits a very familiar pattern. Allegations about a trusted authority figure, reports that get garbled as they go up the chain of authority, an instinctive disbelief that such things could be happening here — all in all, a very difficult task to sort out what actually happened. I am not surprised that the grand jury took a couple of years to work through all of the various reports.

One caution, though, about the grand jury summary. By definition, those are summaries. They leave out a lot of facts, and it is never a good idea to reach conclusions by filling in those gaps, no matter how logical it seems.

Posted in Child Abuse | Leave a comment